Dear Ira,
I was already reading the article with Wourinen, Levine, And Harbison when you forwarded it to me. So for the last 2 days now I have been secretly annoyed. A low grade infection has been troubling me, and I think I'm about to find out what its all about. First let me digress. Wourinen had a recent premiere, which engendered from many seasoned listeners, intelligent souls, and flexible ears a response, which for lack of better words was simply underwhelming. One knowledgeable friend, whom I respect, quipped he (Wourinen) "has done more to set back new music over the years than anyone". According to his theory, at which the sycophant Levine chimed in: It couldn't be clearer . The more work required of an audience to appreciate/ apprehend (I love that word) art, the greater its artfulness and by the same token that which requires no effort in understanding is merely entertainment (no judgment intended)! Mien Gott, So that’s why I've never liked or understood, or comprehended his music, try as I might, after withering attempts, repeated listening, studying his theoretic tomes. It must be, simply, that I am too shallow to "get it".
My secret is finally exposed; I do not want to work that hard to appreciate art. I am Lazy. Years of loafing in front of Michelangelo’s, Da Vinci's, Botticelli's, Manet's, Gauguin’s, staring endlessly at the sensual outpouring of form, shape & harmony; Hours in the hammock reading Thomas Wolff, Thomas Mann, Shakespeare; Evenings intoning the words of Gerard Manly Hopkins, Mayakovsky, Cummings, Neruda not to mention listening to the unabashedly trashy music of Bach, Mozart, Vivaldi, Rachmaninoff, and, oh my lord, Copland. I now understand, it was all toooooooooo easy! I am an utter slut consumer of loose, falling over backwards pleased to meet cha' and I use this word reluctantly, accessible Art.
Shoot, I feel cheated and low. Thank you Mr. Wourinen.
Labels: Art, bach, charles wourinen, entertainment, JamesLevine, mozart